| Cautare |
| |
| Meniu rapid |
|
| |
| Noutati |
Echipa redacţională urează un călduros Bun venit doamnei profesor Lena Dominelli si domnului profesor Malcolm Payne, două personalităţi recunoscute la nivel internaţional în domeniul asistenţei sociale, care au acceptat ca începând cu nr. 1/2010 să facă parte din Advisory Board al Revistei de Asistenţă Socială.
|
| Indexare |
Revista este indexata in ProQuest,EBSCO, Social Work Abstracts, CEEOL,Index Copernicus,SCIPIO,GESIS,IBSS si ERIH+
Revista este acreditata B+ de catre CNCSIS
|
|
Home > Arhiva > 2007 > Numar: 3 > An Approach to Housing for the Poor in the United States: HOPE IV Revitalization in the Clarksdale Neighborhood An Approach to Housing for the Poor in the United States: HOPE IV Revitalization in the Clarksdale Neighborhood
by:
- Ramona Stone (University of Kentucky, College of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior, 121 Washington Street, Lexington, KY 40536, E-mail: Ramona.Stone@uky.edu)
- Anita P. Barbee (University of Louisville, Kent School of Social Work, Oppenheimer Hall, Louisville, KY 40292, E-mail: Anita.Barbee@louisville.edu)
- Dana Patrick (MSSW, Kent School of Social Work, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
)
|
This article is discussing the current policy for urban revitalization in the United States, the characteristics of people who are impacted by it, and the social services that are provided as part of the urban redevelopment projects. It begins with a brief overview of the history of public housing in the United States, and continues with a brief description of the societal shifts that occurred in the 1970s, leading to the current public housing policies which are discussed in detail. Further, current policies are exemplified using the case of Clarksdale revitalization project currently under way in the city of Louisville, KY. The efforts to improve housing options for the poor in Louisville are being evaluated by the first two authors; follow up articles on the evaluation plan and evaluation findings are forthcoming.
Keywords: policy, urban revitalization, social services
|
|
|
|
